A taxing situation - Vilas County News-Review
ABOUT ▼
ADVERTISE
CONTACT
SUBMISSIONS ▼
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
NEWS TIPS
PHOTO SUBMISSIONS
ANNIVERSARY ANNOUNCEMENT
ENGAGEMENT ANNOUNCEMENT
WEDDING ANNOUNCEMENT
OBITUARY POLICY
PHOTO GALLERY
LOGIN-OUT
Search only accepts letters and numbers.
HOME
NEWS ▼
Coronavirus Coverage
Local
National
CDC Microsite
LIFESTYLE ▼
Not that you asked, but . . .
Conover-Land O' Lakes
Phelps
Sayner-St. Germain
Three Lakes
Community Calendar
OUTDOORS ▼
Fishing with the Guides
In the Outdoors
SPORTS ▼
Sports Sidelines
OPINION ▼
Will Maines
Byron McNutt
Cal Thomas
Robert Koehler
Robert Reich
PUBLIC RECORDS ▼
Births
Engagements
Obituaries
Weddings
CLASSIFIEDS ▼
News-Review Classifieds
North Woods Trader Classifieds
SUBSCRIBE
A taxing situation
By Cal Thomas
10/31/2017 11:04 AM
select
Delicious
Blogger
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
MySpace
Tumblr
ShareOnYammer
Pinterest
GoogleBookmarks
ShareOnGooglePlus
Tell a friend
FEDERAL INCOME TAX was first introduced under the Revenue Act of 1861 to help defray war costs. Congress repealed the tax in 1871, when the need for government revenue declined, only to restore it in 1894, as part of the Wilson-Gorman Tariff Act. The public policy debate surrounding the constitutionality of income tax has been going on ever since.
Given the government’s inventive ways of taking our money and spending it irresponsibly, Congress and enough states took care of the unconstitutional part in 1913, with the passage of the 16th Amendment.
The federal government has since raised more money than any government has likely ever raised, while spending more money than any government has ever spent. But the money exits the treasury door just as fast as it comes in.
Congress does not need more of our money. It needs to control spending.
As I have argued in previous columns, the current debate over tax legislation starts at the wrong end. Politicians want us to accept that some people aren’t paying enough. This keeps the debate focused on those who work to earn the money, rather than on politicians who cynically misspend it, in large part, to keep themselves in office.
It is spending, not taxes, that needs to be reformed, but few want to give up their government benefits. Ever try getting information from a government office? And yet people continue to turn to government, even though it does few things well.
In the debate over tax cuts, President Donald Trump seems to be yielding to the class warfare crowd, which believes “the rich” ought to pay more and the bottom 50% should pay even less. A better idea would be to require every American to pay something. Even street panhandlers, some of whom receive tax-free money through welfare benefits, should have some skin in the game.
For any real tax reform to occur, the philosophy behind wealth and income must change. A rich person doesn’t deprive me of money or the opportunity to improve my financial circumstances. There is not one pot of money from which all must draw. We used to teach people how to create their own pots, but now we teach envy, greed and entitlement, an unholy financial and ideological hat trick that improves no one’s life.
If you are middle class or poor, how does taxing rich people benefit you? Does envying the wealthy improve your economic status?
I have never envied the rich. As a college student I wanted to know how people became rich or at least independent of government. Politicians, egged-on by people like Warren Buffet and Bill Gates, make public statements about their wealth that sound like apologies. Their success should instead teach others.
In my grandparents’ day, one was expected to live within one’s means, work hard, save and invest wisely, avoid debt and not covet what your neighbor has, see the 10th Commandment. This was not only good economic advice, but a reflection of one’s moral character. During World War II, neighbors would never think of borrowing more than a cup of sugar or a few ration stamps for fear people would believe them irresponsible. Neighbors and religious institutions were expected to help the truly needy, not government.
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Florida) was on to something when he said “We don’t need new taxes. We need new taxpayers, people that are gainfully employed, making money and paying into the tax system. And then, we need a government that has the discipline to take that additional revenue, and use it to pay down the debt and never grow it again.”
I would start with the second part of his proposal. If followed, the government would not only not need more of our money, it might be forced by voters to give some of it back.
Submit A Comment
Please fill out the form below to submit a comment.
We welcome your comments at vcnewsreview.com. Comments will be limited to 5,000 characters. Persons commenting must provide their full name and email address. Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments should remain on the topic set by the original article. Personal attacks, profanity, slander, libelous statements and texting language will not be allowed. All comments will be reviewed prior to posting. Comments will only be posted during regular business hours. Phone numbers are optional and will not be publicized.
*
indicates a required field
Comment
*
Your Name
Email
Phone
A comment must be approved by our staff before it will be displayed on the website.
Submit
X
Download Our App!
Get notified on Breaking News!
SITE LINKS
AFFILIATES
AFFILIATES (CONT.)
USEFUL INFO
News
Lifestyle
Outdoors
Sports
Opinion
Public Records
Classifieds
Subscribe
More Lifestyles
The Ada Herald
Dearborn County Register
Delphos Herald
Eagle Print
The Harrison Press
Iron County Reporter
The Journal Press
Monroe County Beacon
Ohio County News
Paulding Progress
Putnam County Sentinel
Rising Sun Recorder
Star Gazette
The Times Bulletin
Waushara Argus
Forms and Flyers
Mechanical Information
Media Kit
Rate Card
Preprint Distribution Rate Card
Letters/Comments Policy
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##