Dear Editor:

So many questions. And they come from a freedom-guaranteed American who is well aware that what we are being coerced into as a culture is nothing other than evil tyranny.

Now that an emergency use authorization has just been approved for some 28 million children ages 5-11 to be injected with the same experimental Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine formulation already dispensed to the older age groups which was specifically designed for the original virus strain that no longer exists due to expected mutation, and considering that children are more at risk of contracting the common flu, logic wonders why in the world this is happening?

And just why are virtually unaffected, innocent children so passionately important to the Biden administration? 

Why have thousands of Afghan refugees been welcomed with open arms into our country with nothing more than instructions to take the long-established, life-saving wonder drug Ivermectin prior to entry?

This is the same drug that remains not only demonized as generally dangerous and thus extremely difficult for American citizens to secure today, but was entirely known at the time of the first COVID-19 outbreak in 2020 to be a proven early treatment protocol that would have protected most infected people which currently totals some 740,000 deaths. Unforgivably, Ivermectin is irrefutably approved by the National Institutes of Health for treatment of COVID-19 which Dr. Fauci has been a director at since 1984.

And why has there been numerous patents approved between 2012-’21 that have nothing necessarily to do with protection from the virus, yet are specifically protecting the intellectual property surrounding vaccine delivery systems not limited to the original task of introducing synthetically produced “messenger RNA” (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccines into the body which then teaches our cells how to trigger an artificial immune response? 

U.S. Patent #10,703,789 B2 (dated July 7, 2020) found on Moderna’s website, which also applies to the other COVID vaccines, states in part in its abstract summary, “In one embodiment, therapeutic nanoparticles may be formulated for sustained release., ‘sustained release’ refers to a pharmaceutical composition or compound that conforms to a release rate over a specific period of time. The period of time may include, but is not limited to, hours to years. As a non-limiting example, the sustained release nanoparticle may comprise a therapeutic agent such as, but not limited to, the primary constructs and mRNA of the present invention.” 

Tying in the aforementioned patent’s delivery system with a compatible patent that can best be described as implanted tracking and obedience control, the abstract summary in U.S. Patent #11,107,588 B2 dated Aug. 31, 2021 states, “The system comprises a plurality of electronic devices to generate an ID and, when in proximity of another such device, one or both devices transmit/receive the ID to/from the other device. Then, a score is generated. Additionally, based on information received from a server, relevant treatment instructions are displayed to the subjects based on the information and the score.”

In the patent, an illustrative example as to how a subject’s social rating is determined employs five categories: age, profession, known health conditions, visits religious gatherings, mobility data.

And for skeptics, look no further than the first ever electronically-tracked society recently known as the free country of Australia where the “G2G Now” surveillance system is up and running. Search: “COVID-19 coronavirus: G2G Now frequently asked questions.” 

A question asks, “I’ve missed my check-in window multiple times. Will I get fined?”

Answer, “If you consistently fail to comply, it can result in fines up to $50,000 and imprisonment.”

Frank Gabl

Prospect Heights, Ill.